Defective Balancing Ball
He further alleges that this ball was actively marketed for use by athletes and that defendants represented and warranted that the ball had a six-hundred pound capacity and was “burst resistant.” (Id. ¶¶ 10-11.) Plaintiff alleges defendants knew that, contrary to these representations, the exercise ball was “easily susceptible to bursting when confronted with weight capacities less... than 600 pounds” and that they “placed the exercise ball into the stream of commerce knowing that the exercise ball posed unsafe and dangerous consequences for the users of the product, including Plaintiff, who used the product in a foreseeable manner.
In my opinion the guilty in this case, must be the Ledraplastic balancing ball producer, because in the indications of the product was wroten, that the maximum weight that could resist, was higher than in the reallity, thats why the plaintiff used the ball thinking that there wasnt any problem on it.
